We live in a country where owning an independent house is a lifetime achievement. A home is not a luxury but a necessity. In today’s Pakistan, the previous record and current indicators show that if we do not take timely corrective measures right away, this dream will remain a dream for many of us. To address this, we need to understand the problem, the required volume, economic indicators, and stress points before developing a policy that provides a long-term solution with immediate relief.
We are on the verge of having a backlog of a couple of decades and high population growth: 2.55%, according to the 2023 census, which is the highest in the region. The population density is approximately 331 people per square kilometer. The rapid increase in population has put immense pressure on urban infrastructure, especially housing, water, electricity, healthcare, and education. If the current growth rate continues, Pakistan’s population could reach 371.8 million by 2050, posing serious challenges for resource allocation and sustainable development.
If we quantify the housing backlog in numbers, Pakistan currently needs approximately 10 million housing units, and this requirement increases by around 400,000 to 500,000 units every year. If current trends continue, Pakistan will require approximately 31.875 million housing units by 2050. This projection includes the current housing backlog of 10 million units, an annual increase of roughly 450,000 units, and an estimated 50% delivery inefficiency, meaning half of the delivered plots remain unoccupied or vacant.
While the raw demand by 2050 is calculated to be around 21.25 million units, the high rate of under-utilization in delivered housing, such as the example of up to 80% vacant plots in Lahore, suggests that the actual supply required will need to be significantly higher to meet functional demand. It reflects a deep structural issue in Pakistan’s housing sector, where poor urban planning, speculative landholding, and a lack of affordability exclude most of the population from access to formal housing.
The housing industry is not isolated; it directly fuels over 70 allied industries. Real estate drives demand across the supply chain from cement, steel, sanitary ware, tiles, and glass to electric wiring, plumbing, interior design, furniture, transport, and even IT-enabled services. A housing unit involves 30 trades and professions, from architects and masons to electricians, carpenters, and engineers. Mobilizing this sector means activating job creation, reviving local manufacturing, stimulating small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and expanding the tax net through formalized transactions.
However, the current real estate model is heavily investor-driven, which distorts the market. Investors with high holding power acquire multiple units in speculative projects, leaving them unoccupied for years in the hope of price appreciation. This leads to a paradox where inventory exists, but access doesn’t. An estimated 80% of new housing units in certain urban zones remain vacant, locking billions in idle capital and keeping prices artificially inflated well beyond the reach of the average middle-class family.
The key lies in transitioning toward an end-user-centric development model that focuses on providing single-family residences to genuine home seekers. This requires a joint commitment by the government and developers, backed by policies incentivizing delivery to owner-occupiers instead of short-term speculative profits.
We must also enable accessibility through low-interest bank financing, micro-mortgage solutions, and rental index regulation to improve the affordability ratio. Furthermore, empowering first-time buyers with legal protections, digital transparency, and subsidized financing mechanisms can create a healthy real estate ecosystem grounded in utility, not speculation.
In doing so, we can unlock a ripple effect across the economy: more homes lead to more production, jobs, greater urban stability, and enhanced human capital development. Housing can reshape Pakistan’s economic trajectory when positioned as a fundamental socioeconomic pillar rather than just a luxury asset.
Our urban master plans must immediately align with the real estate development community. One of the critical gaps in our current urban governance is the disconnect between zoning declarations and practical land use documentation. When agricultural land is rezoned for residential use, the land price inflates overnight, not due to any value addition or infrastructure development by the owner, but merely due to the change in zoning status.
A landowner, often a generational farmer, has used their ancestral land for agriculture. Once the zoning status changes from agricultural to residential, the government steps in with infrastructure investment: roads, utilities, master planning, and structure plans. This state-funded development, financed by taxpayer money, significantly raises the value of the land. However, the entire financial benefit is absorbed by the landowner, who contributed neither investment nor effort in the transformation. This unearned windfall creates both inequality and inefficiency in the land market.
The land title document (locally called “Fard”) must clearly state the land use classification to address this. Any change in the zoning or use of that land should automatically reflect in the land registry, triggering either a value adjustment or a compensation framework.
We can also explore a land swap model, where if the government requires agricultural land for urban expansion, it compensates the landholder with an equivalent or slightly larger agricultural parcel elsewhere, ideally with a displacement multiplier (e.g., 10 acres acquired → 15 acres given in exchange). This ensures the individual remains within their productive means while removing the inflated cost of land conversion from the final housing product.
The current model allows urban infrastructure to reach privately held lands, often led by public investment, yet the financial gain is entirely privatized. This creates market distortions and impedes equitable housing development. Land use policy must be modernized and codified to move forward, aligning master planning, development rights, and real estate economics into a cohesive and just framework.
Adopting a forward-thinking New City Seeding methodology is critical to addressing Pakistan’s urban pressure and accelerating sustainable development. Rather than continuing to densify existing overburdened urban cores, we must identify strategic corridors between major cities where we can build well-planned satellite cities that offer urban continuity, economic integration, and social stability.
These new urban centers must not emerge as isolated housing schemes but should be developed as complete, livable ecosystems from day one. To instil public confidence and accelerate population shift, the government and private sector must jointly deploy prominent institutions and life-support infrastructure at the earliest stage. This includes flagship universities, top-tier hospitals, major school networks, public administration branches, and essential utilities. Only then will residents be willing to relocate without hesitation, knowing that opportunity and quality of life follow them.
Doing so allows us to establish modern, self-sustained, smart communities, not reactive settlements. These cities can be the breeding ground for climate-conscious infrastructure, including integrated waste management systems, solar-powered grids, smart traffic control, and real-time utility monitoring.
Unlike our legacy cities, which evolved without structured zoning or mobility foresight, new cities provide a blank canvas. In many older urban centers, the absence of early planning for pedestrian corridors, cycling paths, or car-free zones makes modern mobility practices difficult to implement. As a result, citizens resist shifts toward non-motorized transport. In contrast, new city models offer an opportunity to design decentralized urban nodes where:
This shift supports environmental sustainability, reduces dependency on personal vehicles, and minimizes urban pollution. Moreover, decentralizing core services across urban districts based on population per square kilometer allows cities to scale smartly and avoid congestion.
Implementing such a strategy will significantly reduce the pressure on legacy urban infrastructure, particularly water management, waste disposal, and air quality controls. It will also promote a healthier lifestyle, empower localized economies, and ensure that cities grow not as chaotic sprawls, but as intentional, adaptive, and human-centric ecosystems.
The future of Pakistan’s urban development lies not in replicating outdated modes but in pioneering planned, green, decentralized urbanism that aligns with environmental imperatives and socio-economic realities. Pakistan’s housing crisis is not just a housing issue but an economic, social, and governance challenge. The current investor-driven model has failed the majority. We must transition toward a development framework that serves the end user, prioritizes affordability, and aligns with sustainable urban planning principles.
By integrating housing with broader economic and infrastructure policy, modernizing land use laws, and launching smart satellite cities, Pakistan can turn its housing challenge into an engine for inclusive growth. The time for half-measures is over. We need a bold, unified vision that redefines housing as a national imperative—a right, not a privilege.
We at Eastern Housing provide all the world-class amenities and develop our projects according to the smart living standards. Our mission is to accommodate 100,000 families throughout Pakistan by 2027. The Plan M initiative is to reduce the demand for housing in Pakistan by delivering multiple housing projects on time.
Information
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | A PROJECT OF MAS Group